Question bankMock papersPharmacology SAQ Paper 1

Mock paper · Pharmacology SAQ Paper 1

Four questions,
answered in full.

Four 10-mark questions rebuilt as an exam-first learning resource. Attempt each stem, reveal the model answer, then self-mark and test the viva follow-ups.

01

4 questions, 40 marks in total.

02

Sessions from 2013 to 2023, with the exact stem and mark allocation.

03

Seven original teaching diagrams built for redrawing under examination conditions.

04

A self-marking map for every part, and viva checks on each question.

00

Before you open an answer

Write it first, then mark it

The expanded teaching below is deliberately fuller than a 10-mark script. Write a timed answer before opening each model; the rapid-answer panel then shows what to prioritise under examination conditions, and the self-marking map shows where the marks actually sit.

Self-marked 0 / 40

Question 01 · 10 marksApril 2019 · Question 1

Agonism, antagonism and intravenous anaesthetic receptor targets

Verified past examination stem

  1. With the help of diagrams, define agonism and antagonism and their relationship. (5 marks)
  2. Outline the type of receptors related to the mechanism of action of intravenous anaesthetic agents. (5 marks)
View model answerQuestion first · answer when ready

a. Agonism and antagonism

5 marks
Rapid model answer

Affinity is the ability of a ligand to bind a receptor; efficacy or intrinsic activity is its ability, once bound, to activate the receptor and generate a response. An agonist has both affinity and efficacy. A full agonist can produce the system’s maximal response; a partial agonist has lower efficacy and a lower Emax even at full receptor occupancy; an inverse agonist stabilises the inactive receptor state and reduces constitutive activity below baseline.

An antagonist has affinity but no efficacy and prevents agonist action. A reversible competitive antagonist competes at the same (orthosteric) site, is surmountable, causes a parallel right shift of the agonist log concentration–response curve, increases EC50 and reduces potency without changing Emax. A non-competitive antagonist prevents receptor activation through a different/allosteric mechanism and is insurmountable; in a simple system Emax falls. An irreversible orthosteric antagonist also becomes insurmountable once receptor reserve is exhausted.

Definitions and relationships

Core pharmacodynamic terms
TermAffinityEfficacy / intrinsic activityDose–response consequence
Full agonistPresentHigh enough to generate the system’s maximal response; conventionally α ≈ 1Reaches Emax. Potency is compared by EC50/ED50.
Partial agonistPresent; it may be high or lowIntermediate, 0 < α < 1Lower Emax despite full receptor occupancy. In the presence of a full agonist it can behave as a competitive antagonist by occupying receptors while producing less activation.
Inverse agonistPresentNegative, −1 ≤ α < 0Reduces constitutive receptor activity below baseline by favouring the inactive receptor conformation.
Neutral antagonistPresentNone, α = 0No response alone in a system without agonist; prevents or reduces the response to an agonist.
-2002050100-9-8-7-6-5-4-3log₁₀ agonist concentrationResponse (%)Full agonistPartial agonistInverse agonistconstitutive baselineEC₅₀
Original teaching diagram · agonist classesFull agonist: highest Emax. Partial agonist: lower Emax. Inverse agonist: response below constitutive baseline. Horizontal position reflects potency; plateau height reflects efficacy.
050100-9-7-5-3log₁₀ agonist concentrationResponse (%)Agonist alone+ competitive antagonistright shift
Original teaching diagram · competitive antagonismEC50 increases, potency falls and Emax is preserved: the block is surmountable by more agonist.
050100-9-7-5-3log₁₀ agonist concentrationResponse (%)Agonist aloneInsurmountable blockEₘₐₓ falls
Original teaching diagram · insurmountable antagonismEmax falls. A pure reversible non-competitive model need not shift EC50; irreversible antagonism may first produce a right shift when spare receptors exist, then reduce Emax.

Competitive, non-competitive and irreversible antagonism

What changes on the log concentration–response curve?
TypeBinding / mechanismSurmountable?EC50 / potencyEmax / efficacyExample
Reversible competitiveAgonist and antagonist compete reversibly at the same orthosteric site.YesEC50 rises; potency falls; parallel right shift.Unchanged.Non-depolarising neuromuscular blocker versus acetylcholine at the nicotinic receptor.
Reversible non-competitiveAntagonist binds elsewhere and prevents receptor activation or downstream coupling.NoMay be little changed in the idealised model.Reduced.Ketamine is a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist.
Irreversible orthostericCovalent or extremely persistent binding removes receptors from the available pool.NoMay initially shift right if spare receptors compensate.Falls once receptor reserve is exhausted.Phenoxybenzamine at α-adrenoceptors.
Deeper explanation: spare receptors and why irreversible antagonism may not immediately lower Emax

A tissue may generate a maximal response without every receptor being occupied. These unneeded receptors are a receptor reserve or “spare receptors”. If a small proportion is irreversibly blocked, the remaining receptors can still produce Emax, but a higher agonist concentration is required: the curve shifts right. As progressively more receptors are removed, the reserve is exhausted and Emax falls. This is why “irreversible antagonist = lower Emax” is a useful examination rule but not the entire mechanism.

Suggested self-marking map

0 / 5

Educational allocation derived from the stem, examiner critique and source draft; it is not presented as the official marking scheme.

b. Receptor targets of intravenous anaesthetic agents

5 marks
Rapid model answer
  1. GABAA receptor: pentameric ligand-gated Cl channel. Propofol, thiopentone and etomidate positively modulate GABA action at β-subunit-containing receptors, increasing GABA-mediated Cl conductance, hyperpolarising neurons and producing hypnosis.
  2. NMDA receptor: glutamate-gated excitatory cation channel conducting Na+ and Ca2+. Ketamine blocks the channel non-competitively, reducing excitatory transmission and producing dissociative anaesthesia and analgesia.
  3. Glycine receptor: inhibitory ligand-gated Cl channel, potentiated to a lesser degree by propofol and thiopentone.
  4. Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor: excitatory ligand-gated cation channel; inhibition by propofol and thiopentone reduces excitatory neurotransmission.
  5. Other anaesthetic-sensitive ion channels: two-pore-domain K+ channels increase background K+ conductance and hyperpolarisation; HCN channel modulation alters pacemaker currents and neuronal excitability.
Classification, ionic effect, agents and clinical consequence
Receptor / channelType and normal roleAnaesthetic actionRelevant IV agentsFunctional result
GABAAIonotropic pentameric ligand-gated Cl channel; principal fast inhibitory receptor in the brain.Positive allosteric modulation increases GABA-mediated channel opening and Cl conductance. At high concentrations, barbiturates can directly gate the channel.Propofol, thiopentone, etomidate; benzodiazepines act at a distinct α–γ interface.Membrane hyperpolarisation → reduced neuronal excitability → sedation, amnesia and loss of consciousness.
NMDAIonotropic glutamate receptor; ligand- and voltage-gated excitatory Na+/Ca2+ channel involved in plasticity, pain and memory.Non-competitive open-channel blockade at the phencyclidine site.Ketamine.Reduced glutamatergic excitation → dissociation, hypnosis and analgesia.
GlycineInhibitory ligand-gated Cl channel, prominent in brainstem and spinal cord.Potentiation of glycine-mediated inhibition.Propofol and thiopentone to a lesser extent than their GABAA effects.Additional neuronal inhibition; more relevant to immobility/spinal effects than the principal hypnotic action.
Neuronal nAChExcitatory pentameric ligand-gated cation channel.Inhibition reduces cholinergic excitatory transmission.Propofol and thiopentone.Contributes to CNS depression.
K2P channelsTwo-pore-domain background K+ “leak” channels, including TREK/TASK families.Opening/potentiation increases K+ efflux and stabilises a negative membrane potential.Anaesthetic-sensitive family; the exact importance varies by agent and is better established for some inhaled anaesthetics.Hyperpolarisation → reduced excitability.
HCN channelsHyperpolarisation-activated cyclic-nucleotide-gated channels carrying pacemaker current.Modulation/inhibition alters rhythmic and thalamocortical neuronal firing.Lower-yield anaesthetic-sensitive target; do not present it as the dominant mechanism of the common IV agents.Altered network excitability and contribution to hypnosis.

Suggested self-marking map

0 / 5

Educational allocation; not an official marking scheme.

Take-home points

  • Affinity is binding; efficacy is activation; potency is horizontal position; Emax is vertical height.
  • Competitive antagonism shifts right with Emax preserved; insurmountable antagonism reduces the maximum response.
  • For IV anaesthetic mechanisms, do not stop at the receptor name—classify the channel, state the ion movement and link it to neuronal inhibition or excitation.

Question 02 · 10 marksNovember 2013 · Question 1

First- and zero-order kinetics, and pharmacokinetics by the rectal route

Verified past examination stem

  1. Explain zero and first order kinetics by using examples. (6 marks)
  2. Discuss the pharmacokinetics of drugs administered via the rectal route. (4 marks)
View model answerQuestion first · answer when ready

a. First- and zero-order kinetics

6 marks
Rapid model answer

First-order kinetics: the elimination rate is proportional to drug amount or plasma concentration, so a constant fraction is removed per unit time. Therefore k, clearance and half-life remain constant while the system is linear. Ct = C0e−kt. Concentration falls exponentially on a linear plot and as a straight line on a semilog plot. Most drugs at therapeutic concentrations follow first-order kinetics.

Zero-order kinetics: a capacity-limited elimination pathway is saturated and works at Vmax, so a constant amount is removed per unit time independent of concentration. Concentration falls as a straight line on a linear plot; fractional elimination, apparent clearance and half-life are not constant. At lower concentrations the pathway becomes unsaturated and reverts to first-order kinetics. Examples are ethanol, phenytoin at saturating concentrations, high-dose salicylate and thiopentone during prolonged high-dose infusion.

Direct comparison: first-order versus zero-order elimination
FeatureFirst orderZero order
DefinitionA constant fraction or percentage of the drug present is eliminated per unit time.A constant amount of drug is eliminated per unit time.
Rate equation−dC/dt = kC−dC/dt = k0 ≈ Vmax when the pathway is saturated.
Dependence on concentrationElimination rate falls as concentration falls.Elimination rate is independent of concentration while saturation persists.
Concentration–time equationCt = C0e−ktCt = C0 − k0t, until the saturable process is no longer saturated.
Linear concentration–time plotExponential decline.Straight-line decline.
Semilog concentration–time plotStraight line with slope −k/2.303 for log10 C.Curved; not log-linear.
Elimination rate constant, kConstant under linear conditions.Not an applicable concentration-proportional constant; k0 is an amount/concentration rate.
ClearanceConstant: CL = kVd.Apparent clearance = elimination rate/C, so it falls as concentration rises.
Half-lifeConstant: t½ = 0.693/k.No fixed half-life; the time to halve depends on starting concentration.
ExamplesMost drugs within the therapeutic range.Ethanol; phenytoin when saturated; salicylate in overdose; thiopentone during prolonged high-dose infusion.
First order: −dC/dt = kC → Ct = C0e−kt and t½ = ln(2)/kC = plasma concentration (e.g. mg·L−1), t = time, k = first-order elimination rate constant (time−1), C0 = concentration at time zero.
Zero order: −dC/dt = k0 → Ct = C0 − k0tk0 is a constant concentration change per unit time (e.g. mg·L−1·h−1) for a fixed distribution volume. If expressed as drug amount, the zero-order rate has units of amount per time.
0255075100012345Time (half-lives)Concentration (%)100%50%25%12.5%
Original teaching diagram · first order, linear axesThe amount removed in each interval becomes smaller, but the same fraction is removed during each half-life.
1101000123456Time (half-lives)Concentration (log scale)straight line
Original teaching diagram · first order, semilog concentration axisA straight line confirms log-linear decline; its slope is −k/2.303 when log10 concentration is used.
025507510002468TimeConcentration (%)zero order: constant amounttransitionfirst order after transition
Original teaching diagram · capacity-limited eliminationThe straight segment represents a constant amount removed per unit time while the pathway is saturated. Once concentration falls sufficiently, the process becomes concentration-dependent again.
Deeper explanation: Michaelis–Menten kinetics unifies both orders
Elimination rate = VmaxC / (Km + C)Vmax = maximum elimination capacity; Km = concentration at which the elimination rate is half Vmax; C = concentration.
  • When C ≪ Km, the denominator is approximately Km, so rate ≈ (Vmax/Km)C: first order.
  • When C ≫ Km, the denominator is approximately C, so rate ≈ Vmax: zero order.
  • Phenytoin illustrates why a small dose increase near saturation can cause a disproportionate concentration rise: clearance is no longer constant.

Suggested self-marking map

0 / 6

Educational allocation; not an official marking scheme.

b. Pharmacokinetics of the rectal route

4 marks
Rapid model answer

After dissolution or release from the dosage form, most drugs cross the rectal mucosa by passive diffusion according to Fick’s law. Absorption is often incomplete and variable because the rectum has a small absorptive surface, little fluid for dissolution, variable contact time and blood flow, and may contain faeces; diarrhoea or expulsion shortens contact, while the formulation, drug concentration, lipid solubility, pKa/ionisation and mucosal integrity also matter.

First-pass exposure depends on where absorption occurs. The upper rectum drains through the superior rectal vein → inferior mesenteric vein → portal vein → liver, so drug undergoes hepatic first pass. The lower rectum drains through the middle and inferior rectal veins → internal iliac/systemic circulation, partially bypassing initial hepatic metabolism. Venous anastomoses and uncertain placement make this avoidance incomplete and unpredictable. Bioavailability and time to peak concentration are therefore formulation- and drug-dependent. Examples include paracetamol, diclofenac, diazepam, midazolam, ketamine and barbiturates.

Rate of diffusion ∝ D × A × (C1 − C2) / hD = diffusion coefficient, A = available mucosal surface area, C1 − C2 = concentration gradient, h = diffusion path thickness. This is the exam-relevant form of Fick’s law.

1. Liberation and absorption

  • A suppository must melt/dissolve or a liquid preparation must spread before drug is available. The base, particle size, volume and drug concentration influence liberation.
  • Passive transcellular diffusion favours the unionised, lipid-soluble fraction. Drug pKa, local pH and lipid solubility therefore affect permeability.
  • The rectal mucosa is vascular but has a much smaller surface area than small intestine and little fluid for dissolution. Absorption can be slower or incomplete.
  • Contact with the mucosa is reduced by faeces, diarrhoea, premature expulsion or poor placement. Mucosal disease, perfusion and metabolism by mucosa or intestinal flora add variability.

2. Distribution from the site and first-pass metabolism

Rectal venous drainage determines initial hepatic exposure
Absorption siteVenous drainageInitial destinationPharmacokinetic implication
Upper / proximal rectumSuperior rectal vein → inferior mesenteric veinPortal vein → liverSubject to hepatic first-pass extraction before reaching the systemic circulation.
Lower / distal rectumMiddle rectal vein → internal iliac vein; inferior rectal vein → internal pudendal veinSystemic venous circulationPart of the absorbed dose can avoid initial hepatic first pass.
Real clinical doseExtensive venous anastomoses; dosage form may moveMixed portal and systemic drainageFirst-pass avoidance is partial and unpredictable rather than all-or-none.

3. Bioavailability and clinical implications

  • Absolute bioavailability, F = amount reaching the systemic circulation unchanged / administered dose. It varies markedly between drugs and formulations by the rectal route.
  • The 2013 critique used the examination phrase that rectal bioavailability is variable and may be lower than oral, with larger doses sometimes required. The defensible modern formulation is: do not assume a universal rectal-to-oral dose conversion; use drug- and product-specific dosing.
  • The route can be useful when oral administration or IV access is not feasible, in vomiting/unconscious patients, or for local rectal therapy. It may reduce gastric irritation and partially avoid hepatic first pass.
  • Disadvantages are erratic absorption, uncertain Tmax, patient acceptability, expulsion and mucosal irritation. These make it unsuitable when a rapid, precisely titratable effect is essential.

Suggested self-marking map

0 / 4

Educational allocation; not an official marking scheme.

Take-home points

  • First order removes a fraction and gives an exponential linear-scale curve; zero order removes an amount and gives a straight linear-scale decline.
  • Capacity-limited systems move between orders according to concentration relative to Km.
  • The rectal route gives mixed portal/systemic drainage and variable absorption—partial first-pass avoidance is not guaranteed.

Question 03 · 10 marksOctober 2020 · Question 1

Propofol and sodium thiopentone: pharmacokinetics and central nervous system effects

Verified past examination stem

  1. Pharmacokinetics and its clinical implications. (6 marks)
  2. Central nervous system effects. (4 marks)
View model answerQuestion first · answer when ready

a. Pharmacokinetics and clinical implications

6 marks
Rapid model answer

Both are highly lipid-soluble IV induction agents with rapid brain uptake and rapid awakening after a single bolus mainly by redistribution. Propofol is more highly protein bound, has a larger apparent volume of distribution and far greater clearance through hepatic conjugation plus extrahepatic metabolism; its metabolites are inactive. Thiopentone has lower clearance, accumulates in muscle and fat, and its hepatic oxidative metabolism becomes capacity-limited during prolonged/high-dose administration. Consequently propofol is suitable for infusion, TIVA and repeated sedation, whereas thiopentone recovery becomes progressively prolonged and it is unsuitable for routine maintenance by infusion.

Hypoalbuminaemia increases the free fraction of both drugs. Acidaemia increases the unionised fraction of thiopentone, a weak acid with pKa about 7.6, and can increase brain delivery; propofol has pKa about 11 and is already almost entirely unionised at physiological pH. Reduce and titrate both agents in hypovolaemia, low cardiac output, older age and organ dysfunction because altered central volume, perfusion and sensitivity can matter more than a simple change in terminal half-life.

Paired pharmacokinetic comparison with clinical consequences
FeaturePropofolSodium thiopentoneClinical implication
Typical IV induction doseAbout 1.5–2.5 mg·kg−1, titrated to effect.About 3–5 mg·kg−1, titrated to effect.Requirements fall with age, premedication, hypovolaemia and low cardiac output. Dose scalars in obesity require context; do not give a full fixed total-body-weight dose without titration.
Onset after bolusRapid (one arm–brain circulation time) because both are highly lipid soluble and the brain is highly perfused.Both are effective induction drugs; slow circulation delays onset, so repeated boluses before effect can cause overdose.
Offset after one bolusRapid fall in brain concentration is initially due mainly to redistribution from vessel-rich tissues to muscle and fat—not immediate elimination.Consciousness commonly returns before most drug has been metabolised.
Protein bindingApproximately 98%, mainly albumin.Approximately 80%, mainly albumin.Hypoalbuminaemia and displacement increase unbound active drug; use a smaller, titrated dose.
IonisationWeak acid; pKa ≈ 11. At pH 7.4, the free drug is almost entirely unionised.Weak acid; pKa ≈ 7.6. At pH 7.4, about 60% of the free fraction is unionised.Acidaemia particularly increases unionised thiopentone and facilitates CNS entry. Combined with reduced albumin binding, severe illness can markedly increase effect.
Apparent VdLarge, roughly 3.5–4.5 L·kg−1.Large, roughly 2.5 L·kg−1.Both distribute into fat; propofol's extensive distribution does not prevent relatively rapid recovery because its clearance is high.
MetabolismPredominantly hepatic glucuronidation and sulphation, with important extrahepatic metabolism; inactive metabolites.Slow hepatic oxidation and desulphuration; small amounts of active pentobarbitone may form. Capacity limitation develops with prolonged high exposure.Propofol supports repeated dosing/infusion; thiopentone accumulates and recovery becomes prolonged.
ClearanceHigh, about 30–60 mL·kg−1·min−1; may exceed hepatic blood flow, supporting extrahepatic clearance.Low, about 3–4 mL·kg−1·min−1.After redistribution, elimination of thiopentone is much slower.
ExcretionMostly renal excretion of water-soluble metabolites; little unchanged drug.Renal failure does not simply stop elimination, but altered binding, volume status and metabolite handling still require cautious titration.
Context-sensitive half-timeRelatively short after ordinary anaesthetic infusions, although it lengthens after very prolonged ICU exposure.Increases substantially with dose and infusion duration owing to tissue accumulation and slow/capacity-limited metabolism.Propofol is preferred for TIVA and controllable infusion; thiopentone is not routinely infused for maintenance.
Placental transferBoth cross the placenta because the unionised fraction is lipid soluble.Minimise dose-to-delivery interval and titrate maternal dose; neonatal effect depends on total dose, timing and maternal/fetal physiology.
For a weak acid: pH = pKa + log10(A/HA)HA is the unionised, lipid-soluble form; A is ionised. For thiopentone at pH 7.4 and pKa 7.6, A/HA ≈ 0.63, so about 61% of the free drug is unionised. This is not the same as 61% of the total plasma concentration because much thiopentone is protein bound.
lowmoderatehighshortprolongedInfusion duration (short → prolonged)Context-sensitive half-timePropofolThiopentone
Original qualitative teaching diagram · context-sensitive half-timeThe exact curve depends on the model and infusion scheme. The mark-earning relationship is that propofol recovery remains relatively controllable over ordinary anaesthetic contexts, whereas thiopentone recovery lengthens markedly as peripheral compartments fill and metabolism becomes limiting.
Deeper explanation: connect each kinetic process to the bedside

Distribution and redistribution

After an IV bolus, arterial drug rapidly reaches the vessel-rich group. Brain partial pressure rises, hypnosis occurs, and then drug diffuses down a changing concentration gradient into muscle and fat. This redistribution lowers brain concentration and terminates a single induction dose even though the terminal elimination half-life is much longer. A reduced cardiac output can produce a slower initial rise but a higher peak after a fixed bolus because less drug is diluted and cleared during transit; therefore inject slowly and titrate.

Repeated doses and infusion

Repeated thiopentone fills muscle and fat compartments. Their later return of drug to plasma, combined with low clearance and capacity-limited metabolism, causes prolonged somnolence. Propofol also accumulates during long infusions, but rapid metabolic clearance produces a much more favourable decrement profile for routine TIVA. “Short terminal half-life” is not the reason: clinical recovery depends on the decrement required, infusion duration, compartment filling and clearance.

Organ dysfunction

For either drug, do not predict dose from a single organ label. Liver disease can reduce albumin and metabolic capacity while increasing Vd; renal failure can alter albumin binding and acid–base state; shock reduces central distribution and clearance. The safe implication is a slower, reduced, effect-titrated dose with haemodynamic monitoring. Propofol clearance may be maintained in moderate hepatic or renal impairment because metabolism is high-capacity and partly extrahepatic, but pharmacodynamic sensitivity may still be increased.

Suggested self-marking map

0 / 6

Educational allocation; not an official marking scheme.

b. Central nervous system effects

4 marks
Rapid model answer

Both produce dose-dependent hypnosis, EEG slowing and burst suppression, and reduce cerebral metabolic rate for oxygen (CMRO2), cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume and intracranial pressure (ICP), while largely preserving cerebral autoregulation and CO2 reactivity. Both can reduce mean arterial pressure, so cerebral perfusion pressure may fall despite lower ICP. Neither provides analgesia.

Propofol is antiemetic and commonly produces injection pain and transient excitatory movements; thiopentone is not antiemetic, may be antanalgesic at subhypnotic concentrations and can precipitate acute porphyria. Both are anticonvulsant at adequate doses and may terminate seizures, but propofol's seizure-like movements do not necessarily represent cortical seizure activity. Both lower cerebral metabolic demand, but improved neurological outcome from routine pharmacological “cerebral protection” has not been established.

Central nervous system effects: similarities and discriminators
CNS domainPropofolSodium thiopentoneInterpretation
Consciousness and EEGDose-dependent sedation → hypnosis → EEG slowing and burst suppression.Both can suppress cerebral electrical activity at high dose; EEG-guided dosing may be used in specialist contexts.
CMRO2Decreased.Metabolic demand falls, broadly coupled to reduced CBF.
CBF and cerebral blood volumeDecreased through reduced metabolism and cerebral vasoconstriction.Reduced cerebral blood volume contributes to lower ICP.
ICPDecreased when ventilation and haemodynamics are controlled.Potentially useful in raised ICP, but benefit can be offset if systemic pressure falls.
CPPMay fall because propofol can cause marked systemic hypotension.May fall if MAP falls; often less vasodilatory hypotension than propofol but myocardial depression still occurs.CPP = MAP − ICP. A lower ICP does not guarantee a higher CPP.
Autoregulation and CO2 responseGenerally preserved within clinically relevant anaesthetic dosing, unlike potent cerebral vasodilators.PaCO2 and systemic pressure remain major determinants of CBF.
Seizures and movementsAnticonvulsant at hypnotic doses, yet myoclonus/dystonic or seizure-like movements may occur.Potent anticonvulsant; used for refractory status epilepticus in specialist care.Observed movement after propofol does not prove electrographic seizure.
AnalgesiaNo analgesia.No analgesia; subhypnotic concentrations may be antanalgesic.Add a suitable analgesic when painful stimulation is expected.
Nausea and vomitingIntrinsic antiemetic effect, including at subhypnotic concentration.No useful antiemetic action.A frequent discriminator and a practical advantage of propofol.
Distinct hazardInfusion syndrome with prolonged high-dose exposure; excitatory phenomena.Can precipitate acute porphyria; prolonged sedation with accumulation.These are broader clinical pharmacology distinctions rather than pure cerebral haemodynamic effects.
Cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) = mean arterial pressure (MAP) − intracranial pressure (ICP)Clinical implication: an induction agent may lower ICP yet still reduce CPP if it causes a proportionally greater fall in MAP. Maintain oxygenation, ventilation and systemic perfusion.

Suggested self-marking map

0 / 4

Educational allocation; not an official marking scheme.

Take-home points

  • Single-bolus recovery from either drug begins by redistribution; infusion recovery separates them because propofol clearance is high and thiopentone accumulates.
  • Link protein binding, pKa, clearance and context-sensitive half-time to concrete dosing and recovery implications.
  • Both reduce CMRO2, CBF and ICP; propofol's antiemetic action and thiopentone's porphyria hazard are useful discriminators.

Question 04 · 10 marksOctober 2023 · Question 4

Local anaesthetics: chirality, differential blockade and dose-dependent lignocaine effects

Verified past examination stem

  1. Briefly explain the chirality of local anaesthetics and how it affects the pharmacological action of the drug. (3 marks)
  2. Explain the concept of differential blockade using bupivacaine as an example. (5 marks)
  3. List the dose dependent effects of lignocaine. (2 marks)
View model answerQuestion first · answer when ready

a. Chirality and pharmacological action

3 marks
Rapid model answer

A chiral molecule exists in stereoisomeric forms that are non-superimposable mirror images, usually because a tetrahedral carbon is bonded to four different substituents. These mirror-image forms are enantiomers and their absolute configuration is designated R or S by the Cahn–Ingold–Prelog system. R/S configuration is independent of the direction of optical rotation, (+)/(−).

Enantiomers have essentially the same bulk physicochemical properties in an achiral environment, but interact differently with chiral proteins such as voltage-gated sodium channels, receptors, plasma proteins and metabolising enzymes. They may therefore differ in potency, selectivity, protein binding, metabolism and toxicity. Bupivacaine is a racemate; levobupivacaine is the pure S(−)-enantiomer. Ropivacaine is manufactured as the pure S(−)-enantiomer of the propyl homologue. S-enantiomer preparations show less stereoselective cardiac sodium-channel block and lower CNS/cardiotoxic potential than racemic bupivacaine, although no local anaesthetic is free of systemic toxicity.

From molecular handedness to clinical consequence
ConceptExam-ready explanationLocal-anaesthetic example
Chiral centreUsually an asymmetric sp3 carbon attached to four different groups.The amide local anaesthetics bupivacaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine and ropivacaine possess a stereogenic carbon; lignocaine does not.
EnantiomersNon-superimposable mirror images. A racemate contains equal quantities of both enantiomers.Commercial bupivacaine is racemic R/S bupivacaine; levobupivacaine is S-bupivacaine.
Configuration versus rotationR/S describes three-dimensional configuration by priority rules; (+)/(−) describes measured optical rotation. One cannot be inferred from the other.Levobupivacaine is commonly designated S(−)-bupivacaine.
PharmacodynamicsChiral ion channels and receptors can bind or dissociate enantiomers differently.R-bupivacaine shows greater affinity/persistent block at cardiac sodium channels and contributes disproportionately to cardiotoxicity.
PharmacokineticsChiral enzymes and binding proteins can produce stereoselective metabolism or free concentrations.Clearance and protein interactions may differ between enantiomers, contributing to different systemic-toxicity profiles.

Suggested self-marking map

0 / 3

Educational allocation; not an official marking scheme.

b. Differential blockade with bupivacaine

5 marks
Rapid model answer

Differential blockade is the differing susceptibility of nerve fibres and modalities to local anaesthetic, allowing pain and autonomic transmission to be blocked at concentrations that relatively spare touch, proprioception and motor function. Susceptibility reflects fibre diameter, myelination and internodal distance, sodium-channel subtype/state and firing frequency, and the concentration/duration of local anaesthetic reaching the axon.

Small myelinated B fibres are highly susceptible; nociceptive C and Aδ fibres are blocked at lower concentrations than larger Aβ/Aα fibres supplying touch, proprioception and motor function. In myelinated nerves, conduction fails when enough consecutive nodes of Ranvier—commonly about 2–3—are blocked. Rapidly firing, depolarised nociceptive fibres show frequency/use-dependent block because open and inactivated sodium channels have greater local-anaesthetic affinity. Larger motor fibres have a higher minimum blocking concentration than sensory fibres, so dilute bupivacaine can provide analgesia with relative motor preservation, while increasing concentration produces progressively denser sensory and motor block.

Mechanistic sequence

  1. The unionised fraction crosses the neural membrane; intracellular protonation produces the cation that binds mainly within the voltage-gated Na+ channel.
  2. Binding favours the open/inactivated channel and stabilises non-conducting states. Repetitive firing increases access and binding: use- or frequency-dependent blockade.
  3. Impulse propagation stops when inward Na+ current is insufficient to bring the next segment to threshold. Myelinated axons generally require blockade across about 2–3 successive nodes of Ranvier.
  4. The minimum blocking concentration (Cm) generally rises with axon diameter; motor fibres require approximately twice the concentration required for sensory fibres in comparable experimental conditions.
  5. Clinical selectivity is relative, not absolute. Concentration, total dose, exposed nerve length, route, pH, protein binding, injection site and duration all modify which modalities are lost.
Conceptual susceptibility ladder · lower concentration → higher concentration
B fibres
Preganglionic autonomic
C / Aδ
Pain and temperature
Touch and pressure
Proprioception and motor
Bupivacaine concentration illustrates increasingly dense blockade
Approximate concentrationExpected clinical patternMechanistic interpretation
0.10–0.125%Postoperative or labour analgesia with relative motor preservation.Concentration may exceed Cm for nociceptive fibres while remaining below that for many large motor fibres.
0.25%Denser analgesia suitable for some intraoperative regional techniques; partial motor block may occur.More large sensory fibres and some motor fibres are recruited as concentration and total dose rise.
0.5%Surgical anaesthesia with dense sensory and motor blockade.Concentration exceeds the blocking threshold for a broader fibre population.

Suggested self-marking map

0 / 5

Educational allocation; not an official marking scheme.

c. Dose-dependent effects of lignocaine

2 marks
Rapid model answer

As plasma lignocaine rises: 1–5 µg·mL−1 produces analgesic/antiarrhythmic effects; 5–10 causes circumoral numbness, tinnitus and muscle twitching, with systemic hypotension and myocardial depression; 10–15 causes seizures and unconsciousness; 15–25 causes apnoea and coma; and >25 µg·mL−1 causes severe cardiovascular depression/collapse.

Approximate plasma lignocaine concentration and systemic effect
Plasma concentration (µg·mL−1)Expected effectsPhysiological progression
1–5Analgesic and therapeutic antiarrhythmic effects.Desired systemic pharmacology; no toxicity expected in most patients.
5–10Circumoral numbness, tongue paraesthesia, tinnitus, dizziness/visual disturbance, skeletal muscle twitching; systemic hypotension and myocardial depression may appear.Preferential block of inhibitory CNS pathways can cause excitation; cardiac conduction and contractility begin to be impaired.
10–15Generalised seizures and unconsciousness.Excitation progresses before widespread CNS depression.
15–25Apnoea, profound CNS depression and coma.Widespread neuronal sodium-channel block suppresses ventilation and consciousness.
>25Severe cardiovascular depression/collapse, malignant arrhythmia and possible cardiac arrest.Cardiac sodium-channel blockade, reduced conduction/contractility and vascular effects become life-threatening.

Suggested self-marking map

0 / 2

Educational allocation; not an official marking scheme.

Take-home points

  • Chirality creates enantiomers whose interactions with chiral proteins can change potency, kinetics and toxicity; R/S is not the same as (+)/(−).
  • Differential block is concentration-dependent relative selectivity, explained by fibre size, myelin/nodes, channel state and firing frequency.
  • For lignocaine toxicity, write the concentration ranges with µg·mL−1 and the orderly progression from neurological excitation to CNS and cardiovascular depression.
Connecting…
Account progress

Connecting your study progress…

Account & profile